Drawing for FIESTA FRUITS

USPTO serial 76304439

FIESTA FRUITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIESTA FRUITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Capone

John Capone GTECH, Corporate Headquaters10 Memorial BlvdProvidence, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GAMING MACHINES FEATURING SLOT MACHINES TYPE GAMES VIA VIDEO DISPLAY; ELECTRONIC SLOT MACHINES TO BE SOLD EXCLUSIVELY BY A SALES BRANCH AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES OF THE APPLICANT DIRECTLY TO CASINO OPERATORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2008REINREINSTATED—
Mar 26, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 19, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 17, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 28, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 11, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 14, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 27, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance