Drawing for BIO.IT

USPTO serial 76304442

BIO.IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIO.IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Horst M. Kasper

HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041education, training, and entertainment activities, namely, exhibitions, seminars, and conferences in the field of gastronomy relating to natural and biological food for consumersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance