USPTO serial 76304593
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore D. Lienesch
JESSICA S SACHS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DR STE 400TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beverages, namely, fruit flavored beverages, fruit juices, carbonated drinks, shaved ice beverages, sodas, and bottled water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |