USPTO serial 76304627
BRITEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr., Esq.
GEZA C ZIEGLER JR ESQ PERMAN AND GREEN LLP425 POST RD STE 200FAIRFIELD, CT 06430-6294UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Home theater products, namely, home audio-video products, namely video projectors, namely, liquid crystal displays (LCOs), digital light processors (DLPs), cathode ray tubes (CRTs), and liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS); digital audio and video devices, namely, digital video recorders; audio and video receivers; video monitors; television and video converters; signal processors; television sets, namely, flat panel plasma; and digital video processors, also known as scalers, for high resolution video pictures; Home theater accessories, namely, screens, namely, projection screens and video screens; cables, namely; coaxial cables, fiber optic cables, power cables, and electrical cables; and lifts, which automatically lower and retract video projectors from ceilings | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Home theater acoustic treatments, namely, acoustical panels for buildings, namely, architectural acoustic products, namely, sound absorbers and diffusers, namely, acoustical insulation barrier panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Home theater accessories, namely, furniture; cabinets; entertainment centers; wall units; seats; and tables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Markland Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Markland Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named BRITEVISION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |