Drawing for CREATIVE DIRECT

USPTO serial 76304688

CREATIVE DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREATIVE DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen R. Stroud

GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices, compact disc players, CD-ROM writers; computer keyboard, computer software for the creation and manipulation of multimedia presentations that synchronize audio output with video and graphics; optical discs; CD-ROM drives; blank magnetic computer tapes; floppy disks for computers; integrated circuits; computer interface boards; blank magnetic data carriers; computer mouse; printed circuits; computer operating programs; and parts and fitting for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
042Providing computer information via computer databases and the Internet; computer programming for others; computer services, namely, computer consultancy, improving and updating of computer programs; providing on-line information and updating computer databases in the field of computers; information and advisory services relating to computers; providing on an online computer database in the field of computer hardware and software product informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 22, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance