Drawing for ENDURANCE PLUS

USPTO serial 76304697

ENDURANCE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURANCE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Fishman

MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008BATTERY TOOLS, NAMELY, BRUSHES, WRENCHES, AND PLIERS; AND CUTTING TOOLS, NAMELY BOLT CUTTERS AND WIRE CUTTERSACTIVE—
009BOOSTER CABLES; ELECTRICAL POWER EXTENSION CORDS; BATTERY CABLES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY, HYDROMETERS, BATTERY TESTERS AND LOAD TESTERS, BATTERY HOLD DOWNS, BATTERY TRAYS, BATTERY POSTS, BATTERY TERMINALS, BATTERY CARRIERS, TERMINAL LIFTERS, SPEED CLAMP TERMINALS, TERMINAL ADAPTERS AND CAPS, AND BOLTS, AND LUGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 31, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 21, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance