USPTO serial 76304698
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Battery tools, namely, brushes, wrenches, and pliers; and cutting tools, namely bolt cutters and wire cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Booster cables; electrical power extension cords; battery cables and accessories therefor, namely, hydrometers, battery testers and load testers, battery hold downs, battery trays, battery posts, battery terminals, battery carriers, terminal lifters, speed clamp terminals, terminal adapters and caps, and bolts, and lugs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |