USPTO serial 76304773
REED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW20 OBA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAY FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10010-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Recruitment services; employment agency services; placement services, including such services provided on-line from a computer database or the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |