USPTO serial 76304905
STORM RAIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STORM RAIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry Miller
LARRY MILLER FEDER KASZOVITZ ISAACSON WEBER, ET AL750 LEXINGTON AVE 23RD FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy laser guns; toy water guns; outdoor water activity toys, namely voice-activated water-squirting toy guns, hip-mounted water tank, headset and view finder, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |