USPTO serial 76305323
PLATINUM GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3066246Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 7, 2006
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PLATINUM GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA
TORRANCE, CA
TORRANCE, CA
TORRANCE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS M. KAUTZKY
DOUGLAS M. KAUTZKY LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS M. KAUTZKYSUITE 1053868 CARSON STREETTORRANCE, CA 90503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GOLF EQUIPMENT NAMELY, GOLF CLUBS, GOLF BAGS AND GOLF BALLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKLIN, JOHN S.
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTS SOURCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTS SOURCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPORTS SOURCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PLATINUM GOLF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |