Drawing for CRIME CONTROL

USPTO serial 76305381

CRIME CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CRIME CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RALPH H. DOUGHERTY

RALPH H DOUGHERTY DOUGHERTY, CLEMENTS & HOFERSTE 34001901 ROXBOROUGH RDCHARLOTTE, NC 28211

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037alarm installation and maintenance of burglar, security and fire alarm systems, repair services for alarm and monitoring systemsACTIVE—
042alarm response and verification services, monitoring systems for burglar, security and fire alarm systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 31, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance