USPTO serial 76305407
HARFAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2886973Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARFAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOSTON, MA
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 8E1, CA
PONT-ROUGE, QUEBEC, CA
PONT-ROUGE, QUEBEC, CA
Pont-Rouge (Quebec), CA
PONT-ROUGE, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING, NAMELY SOFTWARE USED TO ASSESS THE CONDITION OF ROADS AND UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURES, TO PLAN FOR REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT TREATMENTS, AND TO ANALYZE AND PROJECT COST RELATED TO REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT TREATMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VFA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Altus Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by HARFAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HARFAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Consultik Itee
- Other trademarks owned by HARFAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HARFAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |