USPTO serial 76305486
PELIKON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PELIKON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS, SWEENEY &P O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electroluminescent lamps; electrolluminescent strip lamps; electroluminescent panels; multi-segment electroluminescent panels; electroluminescent displays; multi-segment electro-luminescent displays; back-lit displays; inverters, electronic circuits and semi-conductors, all for use with the foregoing goods; computer operating systems programs for use with the foregoing displays; data carriers pre-recorded with such computer programs, namely optical media, magnetic media and semiconductor devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Professional technology consultancy, research and design services, all relating to the use, design, development and manufacture of electroluminescent lamps and displays, and of associated electronic circuits, inverters, microprocessors, integrated circuits and semi-conductors; design and development for others of computer programs for the foregoing goods; preparation of reports and provision of information relating to the foregoing goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |