Drawing for Serial No. 76305603

USPTO serial 76305603

Serial No. 76305603

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76305603?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE ST STE 25BOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED MATERIAL, NAMELY, CALENDARS, YEARBOOKS, GAME PROGRAMS; GAME SCHEDULES, PHOTOGRAPHS, BUMPER STICKERS,AUTOGRAPH BOOKS, POSTERS, PLAYER CARDS, TEMPORARY TATTOOS,STICKERS AND DECALS; PENCILS; PENS; PAPER PENNANTS, ALL IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION OF A PROFESSIONAL HOCKEY TEAMACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2002IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance