Drawing for LE SAVOURIN

USPTO serial 76305797

LE SAVOURIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE SAVOURIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas S. Baker, Jr

THOMAS S BAKER JR1371 W 3RD AVECOLUMBUS, OH 43212-2900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved mushrooms; bouillon and preparations for making bouillon; soup broth and preparations for making broth; crystallized fruits; jams; frozen fruits; canned fruits; canned vegetables; canned fish; canned meat, namely ham; gherkins; cream and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit peel; fruit jellies; fruit pulp; preserved fruit; preserved vegetables; olive oil for food; preserved olives; raisins; tomato juice for cooking; tomato puree and tomato paste; preserved trufflesACTIVE—
030Allspice; farinaceous food pastes, namely, alimentary pastes; pasta; cocoa-based mixes for beverages; cocoa; capers; condiments, namely, ketchup, and mustard; couscous, namely, semolina; spices; fondants, namely, sugar-based pastes ingredient in confectionery products; nutmegs; almond paste; pepper; seasonings, namely, saffron; cooking salt; processed semolina; sugar; frozen confections; vanilla flavoringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance