Drawing for ZITA CHARLES

USPTO serial 76305913

ZITA CHARLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOHR, AMY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZITA CHARLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne C. Baker

ANNE C BAKER COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dolls, doll clothing and doll accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 4, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance