USPTO serial 76305985
TITLE WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TITLE WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Haroun
ROBERT M HAROUN SOFER & HAROUN LLP215 Lexington Ave1301NEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Drawing templates | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |