Drawing for HIGH-HEELED HANDBAGS

USPTO serial 76306141

HIGH-HEELED HANDBAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH-HEELED HANDBAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Thornton Smith, Esq.

ROBERT THORNTON SMITH ESQ LINKLATERS1345 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10105-0302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018goods manufactured of leather and imitations of leather, namely, purses, change purses, handbags, wallets, and pocketbooksACTIVEAug 20, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 13, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2004CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 25, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance