USPTO serial 76306301
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Bartels
MARK A BARTELS HAMMER, KIRSCHLING & BARTELS, SC444 REID ST STE 200, P O BOX 5637DC PERE, WI 54115-5637UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |