USPTO serial 76306398
HISTOGENICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HISTOGENICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Holland
DONALD S HOLLAND171 DWIGHT RDLONGMEADOW, MA 01106-1700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | LIVING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE GROWN AND REGENERATED EX VIVO FOR SUBSEQUENT IMPLANTATION INTER VIVO - NAMELY, CARTILAGINOUS TISSUES, COLLAGEN, LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS AND EPITHELIAL TISSUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | BIOTECHNOLOGICAL MACHINERY FOR GROWTH AND REGENERATION EX VIVO OF LIVING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE -NAMELY, CARTILAGINOUS TISSUES, COLLAGEN, LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS AND EPITHELIAL TISSUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL SERVICES - NAMELY, THE EX VIVO GROWTH AND REGENERATION OF LIVING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE AND SURGICAL IMPLANTATION INTER VIVO OF LIVING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE GROWN AND REGENERATED EX VIVO | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |