Drawing for QUICK CLEAN

USPTO serial 76306645

QUICK CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL B. LASKY

MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP, LLC.6500 CITY W PKWY STE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007FLOOR CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CLEANING MACHINES USED TO CLEAN RESTROOMSACTIVEFeb 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance