Drawing for LP 9000

USPTO serial 76306688

LP 9000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LP 9000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Poffenberger

JOHN D POFFENBERGER WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006spring wire; metal hardware, namely, springs; metal tubing, namely, welded steel tubing; metal castings, namely, aluminum die castings; metal casters; metal clips for furniture and bedding spring securementsACTIVE—
017resilient urethane foam for use in the manufacture of bedding and furnitureACTIVE—
020bedding mattresses and mattress foundations, and components of same, namely, springs and insulator pads; furniture components, namely, plastic casters, spring assemblies, molded plastic bases and motion control mechanisms for furniture, namely, chair controls, motion furniture mechanisms and mechanisms for adjustable height work tables; metal bed rails and bed frames; chair rocker bases and springs; chair seat and back springs; bunk beds; daybeds; electric beds; pedestal bed bases; rollaway beds; trundle beds; wooden bed headboards; and merchandising display racksACTIVE—
022synthetic fiber, wool and cotton cushioning materials for use in the manufacture of bedding and furnitureACTIVE—
027carpet paddingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance