Drawing for SATURDAY DECK

USPTO serial 76306728

SATURDAY DECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATURDAY DECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori T. Milvain, Esq.

LORI T MILVAIN GRONEK & LATHAM LLPSTE 600390 N ORANGE AVEORLANDO, FL 32801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Coatings in the nature of paints and stains for interior and exterior use on wood productsACTIVE—
003Wood preparation products such as cleaners, degreasers, strippers and etchersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance