USPTO serial 76306992
EMPOWERED BY INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMPOWERED BY INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK ET AL2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lighting apparatus and installations, namely, electric lamps, fluorescent lamps, incandescent lamps, glow lamps, glow switches, starters for fluorescent lamps and glow lamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Computer printer ribbons; printed matter, namely, posters, badges, playing cards, stickers, and magazines and newspapers featuring news and information on electronic apparatus and Internet; instructional and teaching materials relating to computers, computer peripherals, computer software, computer programming and web sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Customs brokerage services; insurance services, namely, claims processing, claims adjustment and actuarial services for Internet business; electronic payment settlement services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data via global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transportation of goods by trucks and buses; packaging goods for transportation; dissemination, storage, parceling and parcel delivery of goods; inspection of goods for transportation; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named EMPOWERED BY INNOVATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |