USPTO serial 76307002
SPRING-BREAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRING-BREAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. OLTMAN
JOHN H OLTMAN OLTMAN, FLYNN & KUBLER915 MIDDLE RIVER DR STE #415FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304-3585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletries and cosmetics, namely, skin creams and gels, for use before and after suntanning; foundation make-up, rouge, blushes, lipsticks, facial masks, lipshields, skin cleansers, skin toners, face powder, shampoos, non-medicated lip and hair pomades, massage creams, personal deodorants, shave creams and gels, bath gels and lotions, perfumes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |