Drawing for APOMIDE

USPTO serial 76307074

APOMIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APOMIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Anthony Merchant

ROBERT E RICHARDS KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, for the treatment of angiogenesis mediated diseasesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance