USPTO serial 76307085
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sunnyvale, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
GOOD TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE, INC.
SUNNYVALE, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; instant messaging software; pre-recorded computer programs for personal information management; database management software; [ character recognition software; telephony management software; ] electronic mail and messaging software; [ paging software; ] database synchronization software; computer programs for accessing, browsing and searching online databases; enterprise software; [ decision support software; ] transactional software; instruction manuals distributed with the foregoing | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2002 |
| 038 | Telecommunication and on-line communication services, namely, wireless electronic data transmission of data and documents via computer terminals and handheld devices, and electronic transmission of messages and data; transmission of synchronized data and documents; communications via a global computer network or the internet; electronic mail services; electronic transmission of messages; [ paging services; voice mail services; ] providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computer, computer hardware and software, handheld computer, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers, wireless internet appliances, wireless messaging, and wireless electronic data transmission and synchronization; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; computer services related to wireless electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals and handheld devices, and electronic transmission of messages and data | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 17, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer consulting services; computer programming; integration of computer systems and networks; creating and maintaining web-sites; computer hardware, software and internet consulting services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for electronic messaging, [ paging, ] electronic data transmission and synchronization between computer networks and handheld computers [ ; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network ] | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2023 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2023 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 18, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |