USPTO serial 76307202
RUFF-GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976738Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUFF-GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR H. GOLDINER
ARTHUR H GOLDINER431 LEONI DRGROVER BEACH, CA 93433UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | exercise conditioning and rehabilitation devices for human phalanges, namely devices having a raised abrasive surface for simulating guitar strings used to condition human and callous human fingers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 2002 |
| 015 | musical instrument accessories, namely, devices having a raised abrasive surface simulating guitar strings used to condition and callous human fingers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldiner, Arthur Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Goldiner, Arthur Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Goldiner, Arthur Howard
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named RUFF-GRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |