USPTO serial 76307455
DOOR JAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOOR JAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roland H. Shubert
ROLAND H SHUBERTP O BOX 2339RESTON, VA 20195-0339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Hand-operated, wheeled carts for transporting, fitting, and installing doors and panels | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |