Drawing for ROAD RHYTHM

USPTO serial 76307502

ROAD RHYTHM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROAD RHYTHM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Rubin, Esquire

STEPHEN RUBIN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN RUBIN1496 TEAGUE DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing information about individual radio station geographic coverage and programming format along a defined travel route or within a specified area via the Internet or other interactive mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 23, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 10, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 6, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance