Drawing for MIJUN LEE

USPTO serial 76307570

MIJUN LEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIJUN LEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Fishman

MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Artists' hand tools for shaping, sculpting, and scoring clay and modeling compounds; artists' hand tools for cutting clay and modeling compounds namely, art knives, craft knives, putty knives; replacement blades for art knives and craft knives; picks and scrapers for use with clay and modeling compoundsACTIVE—
016Artists' materials and arts and crafts supplies, namely, art paper and craft paper, decorative paper, sketch books, memory books, picture framing mat boards, clay and modeling compounds; artists' tools, namely, brushes, paint brushes and writing styluses; glue and tape for stationery or household use; art prints; display boards; arts and crafts kits comprised of the aforementioned goods; arts and craft paint kits; scrap and memory books and kits therefor, comprised of the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
020Display boxes made of wood and synthetic woodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance