USPTO serial 76307590
PURESPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURESPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Matthews
William P. Matthews Foulston Siefkin LLP1551 N. Waterfront ParkwaySuite 100Wichita, KS 67206-4466Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and make-up kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, mascara, lip and eye liners, lip stick and gloss, eye shadow, blush, foundation, concealer, and make up brushes, facial cleanser, facial moisturizer, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, eye lash curler, tweezers and nail files, all sold as a unit; beauty masks for face and body; shampoo and conditioners, namely hair and skin conditioners; facial concealers, face and body cleansers, face and body creams, face and body emulsions, facial makeup; body powder; lotions for skin, face and body soaps, facial toners, bath lotion, bath oil, bath pearls, bath powder, bubble bath, non-medicated bath salts, body oil; body sprays, liquid soaps for hands, face and body; non-medicated body soaks, scented body spray, and wax strips for removing body hair | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of beauty supplies and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Beauty salons and health spas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE BEAUTY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE BEAUTY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PURESPA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |