USPTO serial 76307593
PURE BEAUTY SALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE BEAUTY SALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Matthews
WILLIAM P MATTHEWS FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP1551 N WATERFRONT PKWY STE 100WICHITA, KS 67206-4466UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and makeup kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, mascara, lip and eye liners, lip stick and gloss, eye shadow, blush, foundation, concealer, and make up brushes, facial cleanser, facial moisturizer, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, eye lash curler, tweezers and nail files, all sold as a unit; beauty masks for face and body; shampoo and conditioners, namely hair and skin conditioners; facial concealers, face and body cleansers, face and body creams, face and body emulsions, facial makeup; body powder; lotions for skin, face and body, and hair-waving lotions; hair mousse, face and body soaps, facial toners, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath lotion, bath oil, bath pearls, bath powder, bubble bath, non-medicated bath salts, body oil; body sprays, liquid soaps for hands, face and body; non-medicated body soaks, scented body spray, and wax strips for removing body hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |