USPTO serial 76307631
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
Starogard Gdanski, PL
Other trademarks owned by Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
Starogard Gdanski, PL
Other trademarks owned by Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
Starogard Gdanski, PL
Other trademarks owned by Fabryka Wodek Gdanskich w Starogardzie Gdanskim S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Dwyer Chapman
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, VODKA, DISTILLED SPIRITS, POTABLE SPIRITS, BRANDY SPIRITS, LIQUEURS, HERB LIQUEURS, DISTILLED LIQUOR, EXTRACTS OF SPIRITUOUS LIQUORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |