USPTO serial 76307808
ERADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2805410Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
Portsmith, NH
BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
Portsmith, NH
BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
Portsmith, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Stein
Matthew D. Stein Pierce Atwood LLP254 Commercial St.Merrill's WharfPortland, ME 04101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in the electronic processing of billing data and payments | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (DE) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ERADS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |