Drawing for AREA 24

USPTO serial 76307958

AREA 24

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AREA 24?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Grandinetti

PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY & GRANDINETTI1725 K ST NW STE 408WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1419UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Wearing apparel for men and women, namely shorts, vests, jackets, coats, sweaters, shirts, sweatshirts, T-shirts, pants, warm-up suits, shoes, socks, suspenders, belts, scarves, aprons, neckties, wrist bands, jerseys, raincoats, rain slickers, rain shoes, rain ponchos, swim suits, gloves, slippers, boots, sandals, dickies, overalls, nightshirts, ear muffs, robes, pajamas, handkerchiefs, coats, jumpsuits, mitts, muffs, neckwarmers, and pants; ski wear, namely ski hats, ski caps, visors, neckwarmers, ski socks, ski jackets, jerseys, ski pants, ski sweaters, jumpsuits, toques, ski mitts, and muffs; head wear, namely hats, caps, rain hats, ear muffs, toques, head bands and visorsACTIVE—
032Alcoholic brewery beverages, namely brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beerACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely organizing and conducting social events, namely music concerts and sporting events and contestsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 200444DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 27, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance