Drawing for THE ULTIMATE SUSHI & SEAFOOD BUFFET

USPTO serial 76307978

THE ULTIMATE SUSHI & SEAFOOD BUFFET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2859304Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2004
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
—

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE ULTIMATE SUSHI & SEAFOOD BUFFET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Goldman

Stephen B. Goldman Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP600 South Avenue WestWestfield, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035[ Providing facilities for business meetings; restaurant franchising; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; providing information in the field of restaurant franchising via the Internet ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 22, 2000
042Food and Beverage services, namely, restaurant services, buffet, catering, providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; providing information in the field of food and beverages namely, restaurant information, catering information, restaurant locations and directions via the Internet; making restaurant reservations for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 22, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 24, 2010C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 24, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2010815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 6, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 4, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance