Drawing for CLIFFS HERITAGE

USPTO serial 76308092

CLIFFS HERITAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLIFFS HERITAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cort Flint

CORT FLINT MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PAPO BOX 10827GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel; namely, jackets, sweaters, sweatshirts, shirts of all type, hats and capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 19, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 27, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 8, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance