USPTO serial 76308179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
PITTSBURGH, PA
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
PITTSBURGH, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary R. Stadelman
GARY R STADELMAN UNITED STATES STEEL CORP600 GRANT ST RM 1500PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2702UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radar for measuring slag depth or thickness, in the field of steel production | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |