USPTO serial 76308299
ARM-LOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARM-LOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Haas
STEVEN M HAAS FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ARM ASSEMBLIES FOR HYDRAULIC EXCAVATORS INCLUDING AN ARM, A CONTROL LINK AND AN INTEGRAL QUICK-COUPLER FOR OPERATIVELY AND PIVOTABLY CONNECTING AN ATTACHMENT TO THE ARM AND CONTROL LINK; ARM ASSEMBLIES FOR HYDRAULIC BACKHOES INCLUDING AN ARM, A CONTROL LINK AND AN INTEGRAL QUICK-COUPLER FOR OPERATIVELY AND PIVOTABLY CONNECTING AN ATTACHMENT TO THE ARM AND CONTROL LINK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |