USPTO serial 76308440
WALNUT ACRES CERTIFIED ORGANIC LIVE PURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALNUT ACRES CERTIFIED ORGANIC LIVE PURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Rochelle, NY
New Rochelle, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F ZIELINSKI
ROBERT F ZIELINSKI WOLF BLOCK SCHORR AND SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | organic foods, namely, fruit-based snacks; soups, namely, meat-based soups and stews, vegetable soup, and chili; and shelf-stable ready to eat meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | organic condiments, namely, sauces and salsas; and shelf-stable ready to eat meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | organic beverages, namely, fruit juices and vegetable juice beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Acirca, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Acirca, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named WALNUT ACRES CERTIFIED ORGANIC LIVE PURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |