USPTO serial 76308476
OMAHA PRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMAHA PRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria H. Finley
VICTORIA H FINLEY BAIRD HOLM MCEACHEN PEDERSEN 1500 WOO1700 FARNAM ST STE 1500OMAHA, NE 68102-2002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely, photocopying services; word processing and typing services; photocopying, reproducing and compiling documents for others; publisher fulfillment services and fulfillment services in the field of printing, document production and print management, namely, commercial and specialty printing project management, complete packaging, kitting, assembly and distribution of documents for others; document binding and preparing publicity documents; rental of office machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
| 042 | printing services, namely, commercial and specialty printing services for others, web-fed printing, sheet-fed printing, computer-to-plate printing, label printing, pre-press services, creative print design and editorial services, graphic art design and printing services, typesetting and desktop publishing services for others | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |