USPTO serial 76308502
VULCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VULCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | FLAMMABLE BAGS CONTAINING FUEL FOR USE WITH BARBECUES; REFILL UNITS CONTAINING GAS LIGHTER FLUID FOR REFILLING LIGHTERS; REFILL UNITS CONTAINING LIGHTER FLUID FOR CIGARETTE LIGHTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | SMOKERS' ARTICLES, NAMELY, PIPE CLEANERS, CIGARETTE PAPERS, CIGARETTE FILTERS, CIGARETTE HAND ROLLING MACHINES, PIPES, CIGARETTE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, TOBACCO POUCHES, ASHTRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL AND CIGARETTE BOXES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; LIGHTERS FOR SMOKERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC CIGAR, CIGARETTE AND PIPE LIGHTERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, FLINT LIGHTERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL AND FLINTS FOR LIGHTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |