Drawing for SIRIUS TELECOM

USPTO serial 76308671

SIRIUS TELECOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SIRIUS TELECOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Jeannette Clark

M JEANNETTE CLARK SEED, MACKALL & COLE LLP1332 ANACAPA ST STE 200SANTA BARBARA, CA 93120-2578UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND DATA NOT INCLUDING RADIO BROADCASTING SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, INTERNATIONAL AND TOLL FREE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; AUTOMATED VOICE RESPONSE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE-ACTIVATED RESPONSE SERVICES; VOICE PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, CALL ROUTING SERVICES; PRIVATE LINE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PRIVATE LINE FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER; FRAME RELAY SERVICE, NAMELY, PROVIDING FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE, NAMELY, ISDN SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA VIA FACSIMILE, ELECTRONIC STORE-AND-FORWARD MESSAGING VIA TELEPHONE, FACSIMILE, PAGER AND E-MAIL; PROVIDING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR AUDIO CONFERENCING, NETWORK CONFERENCING SERVICES, NAMELY, INTERNET CONFERENCING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance