USPTO serial 76308674
SIRIUS TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIRIUS TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Jeannette Clark,
M JEANNETTE CLARK ESQ SEED MACKALL LLP1332 ANACAPA ST STE 200 P O BOX 2578SANTA BARBARA, CA 93120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY - CIRCUIT-BASED SWITCHING FOR TRANSMISSION OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL VOICE, DATA AND FACSIMILE MESSAGES; SWITCH PARTITION SERVICES, NAMELY, LEASING PORTS ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES FOR PLACEMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC; PRIVATE LINE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIVITY SERVICES THROUGH THE LEASE OF PRIVATE LINES OF VARIOUS CAPACITIES (INCLUDING OC-192, OC-48, OC-12, OC-3, DS-3, DS-1); COLLOCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, RENTAL OF RACK OR CAGE SPACE LOCATED IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES FOR THE STORAGE, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |