USPTO serial 76308802
OZOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OZOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Attache cases, backpacks, beach bags; briefcases; card cases, namely business card cases, calling card cases, credit card cases; leather sold in bulk; chain mesh purses not of precious metal; garment bags for travel; handbags; hat boxes of leather; key cases; music cases, namely briefcases designed to hold sheet music; net bags for shopping; parasols; pocket wallets; purses; rucksacks; school bags; shopping bags, namely leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, textile shopping bags; suitcases; traveling bags; traveling trunks; trunks; umbrellas; valises; vanity cases sold empty; wheeled shopping bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Aprons; bandanas; beach clothes, namely, swim trunks, swim caps, swim wear; belts; berets; blouses; boas; boots; brassieres; breeches; camisoles; caps; chemisettes; coats; collar protectors; collars; combinations; corsets; cuffs; drawers; ear muffs; footwear; frocks; furs; gaiters; galoshes; garters; girdles; gloves; half-boots; hats; headbands; headwear; heels; hoods; hosiery; jackets; jerseys; jumpers; knitwear, namely sweaters, vests, cardigans; lingerie; mittens; muffs; neckties; overalls; overcoats; pajamas; pants; parkas; pelerines; pelisses; petticoats; pullovers; footwear, namely pumps; sandals; scarves; shawls; shirt fronts; shirt yokes; shirts; shoes; singlets; skirts; slippers; slips; smocks; socks; spats; sports jerseys; sports shoes; stockings; stoles; stuff jackets; suits; suspenders; sweat-absorbent underclothing; sweaters; swimsuits; t-shirts; tights; topcoats; trousers; underclothing; underpants; vests; waistcoats; waterproof clothing, namely rain coats; wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |