USPTO serial 76308827
CREATING GOOD FROM BAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3149053Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREATING GOOD FROM BAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Canaan, CT
New Canaan, CT
New Canaan, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Burstein
NEIL A BURSTEIN370 LEXINGTON AVESTE 505NEW YORK, NY 10017-6503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FOR THE PROMOTION OF CHILDREN'S CONFIDENCE AND SELF-ESTEEM BY TEACHING AND PROMOTING BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES AND PROVIDING CORRESPONDING TRAINING COURSES FOR ADULTS REGARDING PROBLEMS THAT ADVERSELY IMPACT CHILDREN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |