Drawing for VERA CRUZ

USPTO serial 76308891

VERA CRUZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERA CRUZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 30, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance