USPTO serial 76308912
VENDARIA ENVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENDARIA ENVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Marcus
Joseph R. Marcus Husch Blackwell Sanders Welsh & Katz120 S. Riverside Plaza, 22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS IN AN ELECTRONIC MAGAZINE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY, MOVING IMAGES, STILL IMAGES, GRAPHICS, AUDIO, TEXT AND DATA, VIDEO MAIL, VIDEO BANNERS AND VIDEO POINT OF PURCHASE DISPLAYS, BROADCASTING ADVERTISING PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCING CONTENT FILLED WEBSITES FEATURING DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY MOVING IMAGES, STILL IMAGES, GRAPHICS, AUDIO, TEXT AND DATA, FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF ADVERTISING, BUSINESS, ENTERTAINMENT EDUCATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |