USPTO serial 76308998
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | MUGS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |